Abstract

The architecture and bulk properties of exoplanetary systems confirm that giant impact (GI) events and subsequent dynamical instability, previously inferred from Solar System remnants, are universal mechanisms of planetary evolution. This review establishes observational analogues across distant systems that validate the outcomes predicted by high-resolution Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations: merging, hit-and-run, erosion, and catastrophic disruption.¹

Key Observational Analogues and Data Points:

1. Erosive Impacts (Mercury Analogue): The Kepler-107 system provides unambiguous evidence for GI-induced mantle stripping. Kepler-107c, the outer of two nearly equal-sized planets (1.5–1.6 ), exhibits an extreme density () that is more than double the density of its inner neighbor (Kepler-107b, ).² This disparity, which cannot be explained by stellar photoevaporation, is consistent only with a catastrophic GI that stripped Kepler-107c’s silicate mantle, leaving a core-dominated body.²
2. Transient Collisions (Real-Time Cataclysm): The event ASASSN-21qj, observed around a young star, provides direct confirmation of a recent catastrophic impact between two exoplanets, potentially ice giants.⁵ The collision resulted in a prolonged mid-infrared spike followed years later by an optical dimming, caused by the expanding debris cloud intercepting the line of sight.⁵ Dynamic modeling suggests this massive debris field may ultimately condense into a new satellite system, universalizing the GI mechanism for moon formation.⁶
3. Late-Stage Instability and Collisional Cascades (LHB Analogue): Evolved stellar systems confirm long-term collisional evolution. Polluted white dwarfs (WDs) accrete heavy elements (Mg, Fe, Si, O) from tidally disrupted planetesimals, providing chemical evidence that rocky exoplanets undergo core/mantle differentiation.⁸ Furthermore, debris disks like the one around WD 0145+234 exhibit stochastic brightening events and flux decay characteristic of an ongoing collisional cascade.¹⁰ Dynamically, the existence of highly eccentric (), retrograde giant exoplanets (e.g., TIC 241249530) provides a “snapshot” of planet-planet scattering and gravitational chaos, validating the large-scale dynamical instability hypothesized by the Nice Model.¹¹

These findings confirm that the final properties of terrestrial and giant exoplanets—including their core fraction, rotational dynamics, volatile inventory, and final orbital configuration—are stochastically determined by a violent past. Future research must leverage high-resolution simulations and continued forensic analysis of WD debris to constrain the frequency and specific conditions of GI outcomes that dictate planetary habitability.¹²

Collisional Shaping of Exoplanetary Systems: Analogues to Solar System Giant Impacts and Instability

Section 1: The Giant Impact Paradigm in Planetary Formation: Establishing the Solar System Baseline

Planetary collisions, particularly those classified as giant impacts (GIs), represent energetic, global events that fundamentally determine a planet’s final mass, composition, thermal history, and orbital architecture.¹ Our understanding of these processes is rooted in the architecture of the Solar System, where GIs are invoked to explain major anomalies, setting a crucial baseline for searching for similar phenomena in exoplanetary systems.

1.1. Theoretical Foundations of Giant Impacts and Diverse Outcomes

The most intensively studied giant impact is the collision hypothesized to have formed Earth’s Moon, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis (GIH).⁴ This canonical scenario posits that the proto-Earth was struck by a Mars-sized protoplanet, often labeled Theia, approximately 4.5 billion years ago.⁴ The traditional iteration of the hypothesis suggested that the debris from this collision formed a silicate-rich circumplanetary disk which coalesced into the Moon over months or years, beyond Earth’s Roche limit.⁵

However, newer, high-resolution Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations have introduced the “immediate formation” hypothesis, suggesting the Moon may have formed instantaneously, within a matter of hours, and was placed directly into a wide, stable orbit.⁶ This rapid, single-stage formation model is significant because it directly addresses the long-standing puzzle of the Moon’s near-identical isotopic composition to Earth’s.⁷ Unlike older models where the Moon was expected to be predominantly composed of Theia material, the high-resolution simulations reveal that the resulting satellite’s outer layers—the part most accessible for sampling—are composed of up to 60% proto-Earth material.⁶ This compositional homogenization occurs rapidly and globally during the highly energetic collision, demonstrating that GIs can immediately reset the chemical signature of the resulting satellite, validating the search for chemical evidence of collisions, not just dynamical remnants, in distant systems.

Numerical models delineate a spectrum of GI outcomes depending on impact velocity, angle, and the relative size of the colliding bodies.³ These outcomes dictate the resulting planetary properties, including mass, density, and orbit.³ For the interpretation of exoplanet data, four primary outcomes are critical:

1. Merging (Accretion): The bodies combine to form a single, larger planet.³
2. Hit-and-Run: The impactor survives relatively intact after the collision, but its trajectory and composition are altered.³
3. Erosion: A fraction of the mantle, or even the entire atmosphere, is stripped off the target planet.³
4. Catastrophic Disruption: Both bodies are shattered, leaving only a massive debris field.³

1.2. Giant Impact Signatures Across the Inner Solar System

The physical anomalies present across the Solar System confirm that GIs are the dominant stochastic mechanism of planetary evolution.

1.2.1. Density Modification and Mantle Stripping

Mercury’s anomalously high mean density, which suggests a disproportionately large iron core, is widely attributed to a GI event.⁸ The hypothesis suggests that a massive, erosive impact blasted off a significant portion of the proto-Mercury’s initial silicate mantle, leaving behind a refractory, core-dominated body.⁸ This mechanism provides a clear template: any high-density, core-rich terrestrial exoplanet strongly suggests a history involving mantle-stripping GIs.

1.2.2. Spin, Tilt, and Orbital Configuration

GIs are also the most plausible explanation for the rotational and axial anomalies of several planets. Uranus, for instance, possesses an extreme axial tilt of nearly 98 degrees.¹⁰ Simulations suggest this unique orientation resulted from a single, massive oblique collision with a proto-planetary body early in its history.¹¹ Similarly, Venus’s slow, retrograde rotation is consistent with a GI that reversed its spin, potentially without generating sufficient orbital debris to form a moon, thereby explaining its current lack of a satellite. The specific combination of retrograde rotation and the absence of a moon serves as a key dynamical prediction of the GI model for Venus.

1.2.3. Crustal Structure and Mega-Basins

The Solar System features impact structures so large they altered planetary global structure. Mars exhibits a dramatic crustal dichotomy between the northern plains and the southern highlands.¹² This feature is hypothesized to be the Borealis Basin, a mega-impact structure potentially spanning 8500 km, the largest known basin in the Solar System.¹⁴ This single impact may have melted and thinned the northern crust, while causing recrystallization and thickening in the southern crust.¹² These examples underscore that GIs are not merely satellite formation events but are pervasive drivers shaping planetary density, rotation, axial tilt, crustal structure, and even internal dynamics across all planetary types.

Section 2: Direct Observation of Acute Collisions: Transient Exoplanetary Events

While the Solar System evidence is retrospective, relying on geologic and compositional remnants, advances in astronomical detection have enabled the observation of acute, catastrophic collisions in real time, confirming that the GI process is ongoing in other systems.

2.1. The Observational Challenge and the Utility of Transient Signatures

Since most GIs occurred billions of years ago during the stellar system’s early accretion phase, direct imaging is generally infeasible due to extreme distance and resolution limits.¹⁵ Consequently, research focuses on transient, high-energy events that produce detectable photometric or spectroscopic signatures.¹⁶ These ephemeral observations offer a unique, if fleeting, opportunity to witness active planetary evolution.

2.2. Case Study: ASASSN-21qj – The Collision of Ice Giants

A compelling example of a recent, large-scale collision is the ASASSN-21qj event observed around the young, solar-like star 2MASS J08152329-3859234, located about 1850 light-years away.¹⁶ The event presented a two-part photometric signature: a sudden, prolonged spike in mid-infrared brightness that lasted for over a thousand days, followed three years later by a distinct dimming of the star’s light at visible wavelengths.¹⁶

Scientists analyzing the data concluded that the only consistent explanation was the catastrophic collision between two ice giant exoplanets, potentially similar in size to Uranus or Neptune and estimated to possess masses ranging from several to tens of Earth masses.¹⁷ The immense energy released by the impact would have liquefied the two planets, creating a single molten core enveloped by a massive, hot cloud of gaseous debris, dust, and hot rock.¹⁸ This expanding, glowing material was the source of the prolonged infrared excess.¹⁶ The delayed optical dimming observed three years later confirms the mechanism: it was caused by the expanding debris cloud intercepting the line of sight and eclipsing the central star.¹⁶ This sequence establishes quantifiable constraints on the timeline and size scale of post-impact debris expansion, validating the physical processes modeled for GIs in our own system.

Furthermore, dynamic modeling suggests that the large quantity of circulating material orbiting the collision remnant may eventually condense to form a new generation of moons.¹⁷ This observation confirms that the GI mechanism for generating satellite-forming debris disks is a universal phenomenon, applicable even to large ice giants, extending the GIH beyond the well-known rocky planet systems like Earth-Moon and the Kuiper Belt object Pluto-Charon.⁴

Section 3: Inferring Impact History from Planetary Compositional Anomalies

When a planet survives a giant impact, the event often leaves an indelible structural record. The most durable signature of an erosive collision is a change in the planet’s bulk composition, particularly an elevated core-to-mantle ratio resulting in an anomalously high density.

3.1. The Signature of Mantle Stripping: Extreme Density Anomalies

The Kepler-107 system offers the clearest known example of an erosive GI signature. This system hosts two neighboring super-Earths, Kepler-107b and Kepler-107c, which present a major paradox.²⁰ They possess nearly identical radii (Kepler-107b: ; Kepler-107c: ).²¹ However, the outer planet, 107c, is dramatically denser than its inner neighbor, 107b.²⁰ The inner planet has an Earth-like density of , while the outer planet exhibits an extreme density of .²¹ This density disparity implies that Kepler-107c must contain a significantly larger iron core fraction relative to its bulk size than Kepler-107b.²²

Crucially, standard planetary evolution theories struggle to explain this disparity. The leading alternative mechanism, photoevaporative mass loss induced by stellar X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (XUV) flux, would preferentially affect the less massive, more irradiated inner planet, Kepler-107b, making it the denser body.²¹ Since the outer planet is the dense one, XUV stripping is rigorously excluded as the primary cause.

Instead, the only hypothesis consistent with the observed data is that Kepler-107c was subjected to a massive giant impact.²¹ Simulations suggest the collision was sufficiently energetic to strip off a large portion of Kepler-107c’s lower-density silicate mantle, leaving behind an exceptionally core-dominated body.²⁰ This observation provides the first robust evidence that erosive giant impacts occur frequently enough to significantly alter the bulk internal structure of exoplanets, serving as a direct, observational validation of the theoretical mechanism proposed for the extreme density of Mercury in our own Solar System.⁸

The comparison is visually striking:

Table 1: Compositional Anomalies in the Kepler-107 System

Planet	Radius ()	Mass ()	Bulk Density ()	Core Interpretation	Solar System Analogue
Kepler-107b				Earth-like Silicate/Iron Ratio	Earth/Proto-Earth
Kepler-107c				Giant-Impact Stripped Core (High Iron Fraction)	Mercury (due to high density)

3.2. Volatile Depletion and Delivery

The early history of rocky planets in the inner Solar System confirms that they were initially depleted in essential volatile elements (such as carbon and nitrogen) because the Sun’s intense heat prevented their condensation into planetary building blocks.²⁵ A critical function of late-stage giant impacts in the Solar System was the delivery of these essential volatiles, likely by the final massive impactor, making Earth conducive to life.²⁵ Since GIs regulate the volatile inventory of forming planets, future atmospheric characterization of rocky exoplanets (e.g., using next-generation observatories on targets like TRAPPIST-1b ²⁷) will allow researchers to constrain the history of late-stage impacts and determine if they acted as deliverers or strippers of crucial materials.

Section 4: Collisional Graveyards: White Dwarf Debris Systems

Evolved stars, specifically white dwarfs (WDs), offer a unique approach to studying the collisional history and resulting bulk chemistry of exoplanets. WDs serve as astrophysical forensic tools, allowing scientists to analyze the remnants of planetesimals long after their systems’ main sequences have ended.

4.1. White Dwarfs as Forensics Tools and Proof of Differentiation

White dwarfs possess shallow convection zones where heavy elements sink rapidly due to extremely high gravity.²⁸ Consequently, any detected heavy element “pollution” in the stellar atmosphere (e.g., magnesium, iron, silicon, and oxygen) must result from the recent accretion of orbiting material that was tidally disrupted and deposited onto the WD surface.²⁹

The elemental abundance ratios observed in polluted WD atmospheres are generally dominated by Mg, Fe, Si, and O, matching the expected composition of rocky bodies in our Solar System.²⁸ Furthermore, the detection of fragments with disproportionately high abundances of siderophilic (iron-loving) or lithophilic (rock-loving) elements strongly indicates that the accreting material originated from differentiated bodies—that is, fragments of fully segregated cores or mantles.²⁸ This analysis provides chemical proof that exoplanetary bodies universally undergo the process of internal heating, melting, and core/mantle segregation (differentiation) during their formation, which is a necessary precondition for the energetic GIs seen in the Solar System.

4.2. Analogues to the Proto-Earth/Theia Debris Disk

Beyond compositional analysis, the debris fields associated with giant impacts have been observed directly around young stars. Warm dust belts detected around stars such as HD 23514 and BD+20°307 are chemically and spatially analogous to the type of debris disk predicted to have formed shortly after the Earth-Theia collision.⁴ These belts exhibit high fractional luminosity, indicating that they result from the recent catastrophic collision of large, planet-sized objects, confirming that the debris fields generated by GIs are physically observable in other young stellar systems.

4.3. Collisional Cascades and Long-Term Bombardment

Polluted white dwarfs also provide evidence for the long-term, ongoing collisional evolution of debris fields. Observations of WD debris disks, such as the material orbiting WD 0145+234, reveal stochastic brightening events superimposed on the general decay of infrared flux.³³ This behavior is interpreted as a collisional cascade, where remnants of disrupted planetary bodies continue to smash into one another, grinding down the largest fragments into smaller dust.³³

This process serves as the exoplanetary analogue for the long-lived phase of collisional evolution and grinding that affected our own system’s minor bodies, notably the hypothesized tail of the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB).³⁴ In the Solar System, the LHB is associated with an episode of elevated impact flux between  and  Ga ³⁶, potentially driven by giant planet migration (the Nice Model).³⁷ Terrestrial evidence suggests a residual tail of impactors lasted until  Ga.³⁵ WDs effectively monitor the “Late Stage Bombardment” of their own planetary debris, confirming that the dynamic, fragmenting nature of late-stage bombardment is globally prevalent.

Table 2: Exoplanetary Geology Inferred from White Dwarf Pollution

System Type	Observational Signature	Inferred Parent Body History	Solar System Equivalent
Polluted WD Atmospheres	Mg, Fe, Si, O pollution; specific elemental ratios	Differentiation into core/mantle; fragmentation via tidal/collisional disruption	Terrestrial Planet or Large Differentiated Asteroid Fragments
WD Debris Disks (e.g., WD 0145+234)	Stochastic infrared brightening events	Ongoing collisional grinding/cascades within the debris disk	Asteroid Belt evolution / Late Heavy Bombardment Tail
Young Star Dust Belts (e.g., HD 23514)	Warm dust belt, high fractional luminosity	Recent catastrophic collision of planet-sized objects	Proto-Earth/Theia Debris Disk

Section 5: Dynamical Signatures of Instability and Planet-Planet Scattering

Beyond direct collision signatures, the extreme orbital configurations observed in many exoplanetary systems provide strong evidence that planet-planet scattering and chaotic gravitational interactions—mechanisms analogous to those that caused the Solar System’s Late Heavy Bombardment—are universal dynamical shapers.

5.1. The Universality of Dynamical Instability (Nice Model Analogues)

The Late Heavy Bombardment in our Solar System is attributed to a period of dynamical instability that involved the migration of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.³⁶ This instability scattered large populations of planetesimals into the inner Solar System.³⁴

In exoplanetary systems, particularly the dense, multi-planet configurations discovered by missions like Kepler, orbital instability is common. Numerical modeling of these systems shows that architectures defined by closely spaced planets and overlapping Mean Motion Resonances (MMRs) are highly prone to secular chaos.³⁸ These instabilities frequently lead to strong planet-planet scattering, resulting in either a collision or the ejection of one or more bodies.³⁹ This validation confirms that the mechanisms underlying the Solar System’s LHB are universal archetypes for the late-stage gravitational rearrangement of giant planets.

5.2. Orbital Signatures of Gravitational Perturbation and Scattering

Planetary scattering leaves a lasting mark on orbital geometry, particularly through eccentricity. While the terrestrial planets in our Solar System have low-eccentricity, nearly circular orbits, many exoplanets exhibit highly eccentric, elliptical paths.⁴⁰ High orbital eccentricity is a primary indicator of intense past gravitational interactions, often signifying an event where a planet was scattered by a massive neighbor, potentially ejecting a third body from the system.⁴¹

The gas giant TIC 241249530 provides an extreme example. This massive transiting exoplanet possesses an orbital eccentricity of , the most extreme known for a transiting planet, and exhibits a retrograde orbit (moving opposite to the star’s spin).⁴² Such an eccentric and misaligned orbit is characteristic of a body that has undergone an acute gravitational event, such as strong planet-planet scattering or high-eccentricity tidal migration driven by angular momentum exchange with a stellar companion (the von Zeipel–Lidov–Kozai mechanism).⁴²

This extreme case is interpreted as a direct “snapshot” of a massive planet caught in the process of evolving inward toward the tight, circular orbit characteristic of a “hot Jupiter”.⁴² The presence of such systems affirms that high-energy gravitational chaos and scattering fundamentally govern the final orbital location and rotational alignment of massive exoplanets, establishing a universal dynamic pathway previously inferred only from theoretical models of our own giant planets.

Section 6: Synthesis and Future Observational Imperatives

6.1. The Confirmed Universality of Cataclysmic Planet Formation

The comprehensive evidence collected from exoplanetary systems confirms that the violent, stochastic phase of giant impacts and planetary instability—previously understood primarily through the retrospective study of the Solar System—is a confirmed universal process in planet formation across diverse stellar environments.

The evidence confirms the ubiquity of these processes across multiple detection modalities:

• Transient Events (ASASSN-21qj): Proving that catastrophic collisions occur in real-time, even long after the initial protoplanetary disk dissipation.¹⁸
• Compositional Anomalies (Kepler-107c): Providing unambiguous proof that erosive impacts act as a mechanism for mantle stripping, radically resetting planetary density and internal structure, analogous to the hypothesized history of Mercury.²⁴
• Remnant Forensics (Polluted WDs): Demonstrating chemically that exoplanetary bodies universally undergo differentiation and subsequent fragmentation, with collisional grinding persisting over gigayear timescales, similar to the LHB tail.²⁸
• Dynamical Signatures (TIC 241249530): Confirming that gravitational scattering is a potent mechanism capable of generating extreme eccentricities and retrograde orbits, governing the final placement of giant planets throughout the galaxy.⁴²

Table 3: Collisional Analogues: Solar System vs. Exosystem Synthesis

Solar System Phenomenon	Universal Process	Exoplanet Observational Signature	Key Scientific Implication
Moon Formation (Theia)	Giant Impact Satellite Formation/Stripping	High-Density Super-Earths (Kepler-107c)	Core fraction and density are determined by erosive collisions.24
Uranus/Venus Axial Tilt/Spin	High-Energy Oblique Impact/Scattering	Retrograde/High-Eccentricity Hot Jupiters (TIC 241249530)	Orbital and spin misalignment arise from chaotic dynamical interactions.42
Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB)	Dynamical Instability/Collisional Cascade	Polluted White Dwarf Debris Disks with Stochastic Brightening	Collisional grinding of remnant planetesimals is an ongoing late-stage process.33
Mercury Density Anomaly	Mantle Stripping	Exoplanet Compositional Fingerprints in WD Spectra	Exoplanetary geology, including differentiation, is directly measurable post-mortem.31

6.2. Future Constraints and Open Questions

While the universality of giant impacts is confirmed, key quantitative questions remain regarding the specific parameters that govern outcomes. The reliance on indirect observation necessitates continual refinement of computational models.

Future observational efforts must focus on:

1. Refining Impact Conditions: Analyzing the thermal and compositional properties of post-collision debris clouds (e.g., the aftermath of ASASSN-21qj) using next-generation observatories will provide temperature and compositional data necessary to precisely calibrate SPH models for impactor velocity, angle, and size ratio.²
2. Mapping Exoplanetary Geology: Continued high-resolution spectroscopy of polluted white dwarfs is critical to achieving the precision required to differentiate between the accretion of core, mantle, or crustal material.³⁰ This will allow researchers to map the geological structure and differentiation pathways of destroyed exoplanets across the galaxy.
3. The Habitable Zone Constraint: The question of the rarity of Earth-like planets is intrinsically linked to the specific, chaotic history of giant impacts.⁴³ The successful formation of a habitable world requires a delicate balance of violent events: sufficient impacts for volatile delivery ²⁶ and core formation, but not so catastrophic as to strip the mantle completely or eject the planet entirely. Understanding the universality and statistical probability of specific GI outcomes—such as grazing vs. head-on collisions—is paramount to predicting which exoplanets may possess the necessary ingredients and structure to host life.

Works cited

1. The Role of Giant Impacts in Planet Formation | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371196838_The_Role_of_Giant_Impacts_in_Planet_Formation
2. [2312.15018] The Role of Giant Impacts in Planet Formation – arXiv, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15018
3. The Role of Giant Impacts in Planet Formation | Annual Reviews, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-earth-031621-055545
4. Giant-impact hypothesis – Wikipedia, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis
5. Origin of the Moon, Impactor Theory Caitlin Ahrens NASA Goddard …, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210000977/downloads/Moon-ImpactTheory_Ahrens.pdf
6. Collision May Have Formed the Moon in Mere Hours, Simulations …, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/collision-may-have-formed-the-moon-in-mere-hours-simulations-reveal/
7. (PDF) The Early Solar System – ResearchGate, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14067131_The_Early_Solar_System
8. The origin of mercury | Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO) | US EPA, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/reference_id/4965947
9. accessed on October 11, 2025, https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/reference_id/4965947#:~:text=Mercury’s%20unusually%20high%20mean%20density,close%20proximity%20to%20the%20Sun.
10. The Tilted Giant: Investigating the Catastrophic Past of Uranus | by Boris (Bruce) Kriger | GLOBAL SCIENCE NEWS | Medium, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://medium.com/global-science-news/the-tilted-giant-investigating-the-catastrophic-past-of-uranus-a782401e69c0
11. Effects of a giant impact on Uranus – NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS), accessed on October 11, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910010699
12. Martian dichotomy – Wikipedia, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_dichotomy
13. Marsquakes might explain Mars’ north-south hemisphere differences – EarthSky, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://earthsky.org/space/marsquakes-mars-2-different-halves-martian-dichotomy/
14. Largest craters and impact basins in the solar system, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/bigcraters.html
15. Methods of detecting exoplanets – Wikipedia, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_detecting_exoplanets
16. Astronomers Detect Afterglow of Collision between Two Ice-Giant …, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.sci.news/astronomy/asassn-21qj-collision-two-ice-giant-exoplanets-12347.html
17. Massive planet collision identified from bizarre space ‘afterglow’, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/space-afterglow-signals-huge-planet-collision
18. Discovery Alert: Glowing Cloud Points to a Cosmic Collision – NASA Science, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/universe/exoplanets/discovery-alert-glowing-cloud-points-to-a-cosmic-collision/
19. RESEARCH ARTICLES – SwRI Boulder Office, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www2.boulder.swri.edu/~robin/canup2005.pdf
20. Mismatched Twins – California Academy of Sciences, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://calacademy.org/explore-science/mismatched-twins
21. A giant impact as the likely origin of different twins in the Kepler- 107 exoplanet system, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/files/79795642/1902.01316.pdf
22. Kepler 107: Collision of Worlds | Centauri Dreams, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.centauri-dreams.org/2019/02/20/kepler-107-collision-of-worlds/
23. A giant impact as the likely origin of different twins in the Kepler-107 exoplanet system, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/a-giant-impact-as-the-likely-origin-of-different-twins-in-the-kep
24. [1902.01316] A giant impact as the likely origin of different twins in the Kepler-107 exoplanet system – arXiv, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01316
25. Life on Earth May Be Thanks to a Lucky Planetary Collision – SciTechDaily, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://scitechdaily.com/life-on-earth-may-be-thanks-to-a-lucky-planetary-collision/
26. Planetary collision that formed the moon made life possible on Earth, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://news2.rice.edu/2019/01/23/planetary-collision-that-formed-the-moon-made-life-possible-on-earth-2/
27. Webb’s Impact on Exoplanet Research – NASA Science, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/mission/webb/science-overview/science-explainers/webbs-impact-on-exoplanet-research/
28. Polluted white dwarfs: constraints on the origin and geology of exoplanetary material – Oxford Academic, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/479/3/3814/5046489
29. A cool, magnetic white dwarf accreting planetary debris – Oxford Academic, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/527/2/3122/7339779
30. Chapter 0 White Dwarf Systems: the Composition of Exoplanets – arXiv, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.13294v1
31. [1108.1565] Rocky Extrasolar Planetary Compositions Derived from Externally-Polluted White Dwarfs – arXiv, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1565
32. Study of ‘polluted’ white dwarfs finds that stars and planets grow together, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/study-of-polluted-white-dwarfs-finds-that-stars-and-planets-grow-together
33. Collisions in a gas-rich white dwarf planetary debris disc | Monthly …, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/506/1/432/6307028
34. The Late Heavy Bombardment | Annual Reviews, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020131
35. The Late Heavy Bombardment – SwRI Boulder Office, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www2.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Bottke_Norman_2017_AnnuRev-Earth-Planet_45_619_Late_Heavy_Bombardment.pdf
36. Late Heavy Bombardment – Wikipedia, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Heavy_Bombardment
37. Nice model – Wikipedia, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nice_model
38. Relative habitability of exoplanet systems with two giant planets | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | Oxford Academic, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/514/4/4765/6618559
39. Differences between Stable and Unstable Architectures of Compact Planetary Systems, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2404.06567v1
40. Orbital eccentricity – Wikipedia, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_eccentricity
41. Most eccentric planet known flashes astronomers with reflected light | SF State News, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://news.sfsu.edu/archive/news-story/most-eccentric-planet-known-flashes-astronomers-reflected-light.html
42. Exoplanet caught in ‘hairpin turn’ signals how high-mass gas giants …, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://science.psu.edu/news/exoplanet-hairpin-turns
43. How giant impacts shaped the formation of the solar system’s planets | Space, accessed on October 11, 2025, https://www.space.com/giant-impacts-shaped-solar-system-planets