Abstract

This literature review examines the dramatic advancements in exoplanet atmospheric characterization, charting the field’s transition from initial detections to detailed, high-fidelity spectroscopic analyses in the era of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).

The foundational observational techniques—Transmission Spectroscopy (Charbonneau et al. ) and Secondary Eclipse/Emission Spectroscopy (Deming et al. )—have been augmented by the deployment of High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS) for dynamic studies and the integration of high-contrast integral field spectroscopy on next-generation instruments like the Extremely Large Telescope’s (ELT) HARMONI for molecule mapping.  

The advent of JWST has driven immediate breakthroughs, providing the first definitive evidence of complex photochemistry (SO2​ and CO2​ on WASP-39b ), enabling the characterization of the notoriously opaque sub-Neptune GJ 1214b below its thick haze layer , and identifying the intriguing Hycean candidate K2-18b through the detection of carbon-bearing molecules.  

This influx of high-precision data has exposed critical methodological and physical hurdles. Computationally, the complexity and volume of JWST spectra have rendered traditional Bayesian retrieval methods prohibitively expensive. This challenge is being addressed by a paradigm shift toward amortized inference using neural networks (e.g., FASTER), which performs practically instantaneous Bayesian analysis and model comparison. Physically, persistent debates center on the cloud/haze degeneracy problem and the revelation that imperfect stellar models introduce significant systematic errors in emission spectroscopy, even for high-precision JWST data.  

For future research, the review highlights critical gaps, particularly the severe data scarcity for temperate rocky exoplanets and the theoretical disconnect between retrieved atmospheric compositions and protoplanetary disk evolution. The search for biosignatures must adhere to the principle of life as the “hypothesis of last resort” , requiring comprehensive contextual observations to rigorously rule out abiotic false positives. Future success hinges on the coordinated synergy between the statistical census capabilities of missions like ARIEL and the dynamical mapping capabilities of ELT-class ground-based facilities , prioritizing large-scale, multi-transit campaigns to characterize habitable-zone worlds.

Advances in Exoplanet Atmospheric Characterization: Techniques, Discoveries, and Future Prospects

I. Introduction and Historical Context

I.A. Defining the Scientific Imperative and Scope of Characterization

Exoplanet atmospheric characterization represents the critical pivot in exoplanetary science, moving research beyond the statistical detection of new worlds toward the detailed investigation of their physical and chemical states. This undertaking is paramount, as the atmosphere serves as the observable link connecting a planet’s formation mechanisms, its long-term evolution, and its ultimate potential for supporting life. The scope of characterization has expanded dramatically, evolving from the initial measurement of bulk planetary properties (mass, radius) to an exhaustive spectroscopic census that seeks to determine atmospheric composition, thermal structure, and dynamic processes, including global circulation patterns and atmospheric loss.¹ These comprehensive investigations are essential for interpreting the conditions that prevail on extrasolar planets.

I.B. The Foundational Era: From Detection to First Light

The current capability for atmospheric characterization is entirely dependent upon the foundational techniques of radial velocity and transit photometry, which established the prerequisite bulk parameters—mass, radius, and orbital configuration—necessary to select viable targets.

The characterization era was inaugurated by landmark spectroscopic achievements utilizing the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The first robust detection of an exoplanet atmosphere was reported by Charbonneau et al. in 2002.² Using the HST’s STIS spectrograph, the team measured absorption from atomic Sodium (Na D lines) in the optical transmission spectrum of the hot Jupiter HD209458b, detecting a signal at a level of  percent.² This successful detection established transmission spectroscopy as the primary early tool for probing exoplanetary envelopes. It is important to note that the difficulty encountered in confirming this Na detection from ground-based telescopes at the time, due to pervasive systematic effects and contamination, directly foreshadowed the subsequent necessary development of High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS).¹ The limitations imposed by telluric (Earth’s atmospheric) and stellar contamination became the driving force necessitating the technological shift toward instruments capable of high spectral resolving power for effective isolation of the planetary signal.¹

Following the success of transmission spectroscopy, the field rapidly progressed to measure thermal emission. Deming et al. (2005) pioneered occultation spectroscopy, or secondary eclipse spectroscopy, demonstrating the ability to measure the planet’s emitted light when it passes behind its host star.³ This technique provided the first constraints on dayside temperature profiles. The success of occultation spectroscopy served as a critical foundational justification for the design requirements and wavelength coverage specifications of future large, cryogenic space observatories, recognizing the inherent need for high-sensitivity infrared capabilities realized today by JWST.³

Concurrently, a separate branch of atmospheric characterization emerged with the first robust direct images of exoplanets published by Kalas et al. (2008) and Marois et al. (2008). These images captured young, self-luminous gas giants (e.g., Fomalhaut b and the HR 8799 system).⁴ This area of research highlighted the extreme technical challenges involved, specifically the necessity of suppressing the host star’s light (which can be up to  times brighter than the planet) to overcome diffraction and scattering limitations imposed by physics and engineering.⁴ These early efforts utilized techniques such as coronagraphy and angular differential imaging (ADI) to confirm planetary identity and obtain initial low-resolution spectral data.⁴

The historical trajectory shows a clear scientific mandate: the progression from easily studied, massive, highly irradiated planets (Hot Jupiters) toward the daunting challenge of characterizing faint, low-mass, temperate, rocky worlds, necessitating an exponential increase in observational precision and modeling sophistication.⁵

Table I: Seminal Studies Driving Exoplanet Atmospheric Characterization

Study (Author, Year)	Technique	Target Class	Core Finding
Charbonneau et al. (2002) 2	Transmission Spectroscopy (HST)	Hot Jupiter (HD209458b)	First robust detection of an exoplanet atmosphere (Sodium).
Deming et al. (2005) 3	Secondary Eclipse Spectroscopy	Hot Jupiters	Demonstrated thermal emission measurement (occultation spectroscopy).
Marois et al. (2008); Kalas et al. (2008) 4	Direct Imaging	Young Gas Giants (HR 8799, Fomalhaut b)	First images and low-res spectra, confirming planet identity and structure.
JWST/NASA (2022-present) 5	Transmission/Emission Spectroscopy	Gas Giants, Sub-Neptunes	First detections of , , and complex photochemistry (WASP-39b); identification of Hycean candidates (K2-18b).

II. Observational Techniques for Atmospheric Probing

II.A. Transit and Eclipse Spectroscopy: Principles and Limitations

Transmission Spectroscopy yields information on the atmospheric absorption profile at the planet’s terminator as it passes in front of the star. The signal is proportional to the atmospheric scale height, making it highly effective for gas-rich envelopes. However, stellar contamination, driven by phenomena such as starspots and active regions, remains a persistent systematic barrier, particularly for the small signal sizes expected from Earth-sized planets orbiting active M-dwarf stars.⁷ This effect can severely obscure or mimic atmospheric features, complicating robust retrieval.

Secondary Eclipse Spectroscopy (Emission Spectroscopy) measures the thermal radiation emitted by the planet’s dayside. This technique provides critical insights into the planetary thermal structure, energy redistribution, and circulation patterns. While often assumed to be less susceptible to stellar surface inhomogeneity than transmission spectroscopy, recent research has indicated a critical dependence on the accuracy of stellar models. The use of imperfect knowledge regarding stellar spectra introduces systematic uncertainty in emission spectroscopy that substantially limits the ability to constrain parameters like planetary albedo and distinguish between different types of bare rocky surfaces.⁷ Specifically, discrepancies between current stellar models (e.g., SPHINX vs. PHOENIX) can lead to differences of up to 60 ppm in eclipse depth estimations for M8 stars, creating degeneracies that weaken constraints on the presence of an atmosphere.⁷ This finding necessitates a strategic shift, requiring that future high-precision emission observations, particularly with JWST, systematically include dedicated stellar mid-infrared spectroscopy to mitigate these uncertainties and ensure the fidelity of the retrieved planetary parameters.⁷

II.B. High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS) and Kinematics

High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS), generally executed by instruments on large ground-based telescopes, has matured into a mainstream characterization technique.¹ The chief advantage of HRS lies in its exceptional spectral resolving power (), which allows for the efficient separation of the planetary signal from terrestrial (telluric) and stellar contaminants using the planet’s significant Doppler velocity shift.¹

HRS is indispensable for moving beyond static chemical inventories to dynamic atmospheric science. It facilitates detailed studies of global winds, atmospheric circulation patterns, and atmospheric loss mechanisms.¹ Key findings utilizing HRS include the detection of a rich spectrum of atomic and ionic species in the highest irradiated planets. Furthermore, the observation of enormous leading and/or trailing tails of light gases, such as helium, escaping these highly irradiated worlds provides unique and direct insights into planetary evolution and atmospheric escape processes.¹ The ability of HRS to provide precise measurements of kinematics makes it the ideal complementary tool to the high-precision flux measurements delivered by space-based platforms like JWST.

II.C. Direct Imaging (DI) and High-Contrast Spectroscopy

Direct imaging, though limited to wide-separation, typically young, and self-luminous planets, offers the advantage of isolating the planetary light source. Historically, the technique has been constrained by the immense contrast ratio between the planet and its star, along with the necessity of overcoming complex optical barriers like diffraction and speckle noise.⁴ Modern approaches utilize highly optimized coronagraphy, sophisticated adaptive optics (AO), and angular/spectral differential imaging.⁴

The future trajectory of DI involves the merger of high-contrast capabilities with integral field spectroscopy. The ELT instrument HARMONI, for example, will combine high-contrast AO with medium-resolution spectroscopy (up to ).⁹ This synergy enables “molecule mapping,” a technique that uses the molecular signatures within the spectrum to disentangle the faint planetary signal from residual stellar and telluric background noise, significantly boosting the signal-to-noise ratio.⁹ Simulations indicate that this combined approach allows for the detection of companions up to 2.5 magnitudes fainter than achievable with classical high-contrast imaging methods, reaching contrasts of 16 magnitudes at close separations (down to 75 mas).⁹ This demonstrates a definitive evolution of direct imaging into a powerful tool for routine atmospheric characterization, rather than just detection.

III. The Role of Current and Future Instrumentation

III.A. The JWST Revolution: High-Precision Infrared Spectroscopy

JWST, leveraging its cryogenic operating environment and high-precision infrared instruments, has delivered the breakthrough data anticipated since the earliest thermal emission studies.³ Its broad-band, high-fidelity spectroscopy (NIRSpec, MIRI) facilitates both precise molecular detection and detailed mapping of thermal structures.

JWST’s observations have provided critical proof-of-concept for complex atmospheric processes. For instance, the first definitive detection of carbon dioxide () and sulfur dioxide () in the atmosphere of the hot Saturn WASP-39b was achieved using JWST.⁵ The  detection is particularly telling, as it serves as unambiguous evidence of active photochemistry—chemical reactions driven by energetic stellar radiation—indicating the capability to probe atmospheric processes beyond simple chemical equilibrium models.⁵ JWST is also pushing into the terrestrial regime, exemplified by the first thermal emission measurement on an Earth-sized planet, TRAPPIST-1b, which suggested the absence of a significant atmosphere.⁵

III.B. Future Space Missions: ARIEL’s Comprehensive Survey Strategy

While JWST focuses on highly detailed case studies, the ESA ARIEL mission (launch 2029) is designed to address the need for statistical characterization by surveying the atmospheres of hundreds of exoplanets.¹¹ ARIEL’s instrumentation includes spectrometers and photometers providing continuous spectral coverage from 0.5 to 7.8 .¹²

The strategic goal of ARIEL is to define population trends, allowing robust testing of planet formation theories (e.g., correlations with stellar metallicity ¹³) and establishing definitive atmospheric classifications for diverse planetary types. A key component is the NASA CASE instrument, dedicated to characterizing and observing clouds and hazes.¹¹ This directly tackles the cloud/haze degeneracy problem ¹⁴, ensuring that the retrieved chemical compositions across the statistical sample are reliable and quantified.¹¹ The statistical power afforded by ARIEL is necessary to calibrate the prevalence of the complex phenomena (e.g., photochemistry, inversions) initially discovered by JWST.

III.C. Ground-Based Giant Telescopes (ELT) and High-Contrast Characterization

The future generation of Extremely Large Telescopes (ELT) will provide unprecedented light-gathering power for high-resolution and high-contrast atmospheric characterization. Instruments like HARMONI on the ELT will combine sophisticated adaptive optics with integral field spectroscopy.⁹

The synergy between the statistical precision of JWST/ARIEL and the dynamical capabilities of the ELT is critical. The massive increase in light collecting area and the superior HRS capabilities on ELTs are projected to increase detection speed for HRS by up to three orders of magnitude.¹ This dramatic improvement is the key factor that finally makes the characterization of temperate, rocky exoplanets tractable for ground-based facilities. This necessity confirms that the study of small, faint worlds requires a joint space-ground roadmap, coordinating campaigns (such as prioritizing multi-transit windows on JWST ⁸) with the kinematic mapping capabilities of ELT HRS.¹

IV. Advanced Atmospheric Modeling and Retrieval

IV.A. Radiative Transfer, Clouds, and the Degeneracy Problem

The sophisticated forward modeling of exoplanet atmospheres requires solving the radiative transfer equation coupled with complex thermal and chemical models. A persistent physical hurdle remains the ubiquitous presence of clouds and hazes, which efficiently scatter and absorb light, muting diagnostic spectral features.¹⁴ This effect introduces a critical degeneracy in retrieval analyses, meaning multiple atmospheric models can equally fit the observational data, leading to ambiguous constraints on chemical composition or temperature structure. Comprehensive cloud modeling is therefore recognized as potentially the limiting factor in the ability to fully interpret future high-fidelity observations.¹⁴

However, the degeneracy is proving to be wavelength-dependent. The success of JWST in probing the heavy-element-rich atmosphere of GJ 1214b ¹⁵, a planet traditionally opaque due to a thick haze layer ¹⁶, demonstrates that observation in the mid-infrared can penetrate below the obscuring layers. This reinforces the need for broad-wavelength coverage (e.g., ARIEL’s  to  range ¹²) to maximize pressure level penetration and provide simultaneous constraints on high-altitude opacity (haze) and deeper chemical composition.

IV.B. Atmospheric Retrieval: Computational Bottlenecks and the Paradigm Shift

Historically, atmospheric properties have been inferred from spectra using Bayesian retrieval methods, typically implemented via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or Nested Sampling. These techniques are computationally demanding because they must explore a complex parameter space defined by thermal profiles, chemical compositions, and cloud models to identify the best fit.¹⁷

The massive influx of high-quality spectra from JWST, requiring analysis over thousands of targets and demanding exploration of large ensembles of complex models ¹⁸, has rendered traditional Bayesian inference methods prohibitively expensive.¹⁷ This computational pressure necessitates a fundamental algorithmic paradigm shift.

The development of neural-network based techniques, such as FASTER (Fast Amortized Simulation-based Transiting Exoplanet Retrieval) ¹⁷, offers the necessary solution through amortized inference. This framework performs practically instantaneous Bayesian inference and model comparison after an initial training phase, matching the posterior distribution results of classical techniques (e.g., for WASP-39b).¹⁷ The critical advantage of amortized inference is its ability to perform analyses over large ensembles of spectra—real or simulated—at minimal additional computational cost.¹⁸ This constitutes a requisite technological leap, allowing researchers to quickly gain valuable insight into complex model distinctions (such as cloudy vs. cloud-free models), which would be computationally intractable using classical methods.¹⁸

IV.C. Global Circulation Models (GCMs) and Photochemistry

Interpreting the thermal profiles and energy budgets of exoplanets, particularly tidally locked worlds, requires moving beyond simple one-dimensional models to use three-dimensional Global Circulation Models (GCMs). GCMs simulate heat redistribution, global winds, and circulation patterns (e.g., the potential for anti-Hadley circulation hypothesized for planets like GJ 1214b ¹⁹).

The modern evolution of GCMs involves coupling them with sophisticated photochemical kinetics schemes.²⁰ This coupling is vital for understanding how the external environment, such as intense stellar flares, chemically alters the atmosphere. For M-dwarf orbiting terrestrial planets, stellar flares can induce significant changes in atmospheric composition via high-energy UV irradiation, fundamentally impacting the long-term viability of the atmosphere and its potential habitability.²⁰ This integrative modeling confirms that atmospheric modeling now functions as a crucial diagnostic tool for interpreting time-dependent physical and chemical processes, rather than simply providing a static compositional fit.

V. Characterization Discoveries by Planet Class

V.A. Hot Jupiters and Gas Giants

Retrieval analyses focusing on Hot Jupiters have provided key constraints on planet formation theory. These massive, highly irradiated worlds display rich chemical spectra, often featuring atomic and ionic species.¹ Analysis of their compositions frequently points toward solar metallicities and chemistry, which generally supports the Core Accretion model for giant planet formation.¹ Furthermore, recent advancements have enabled the detection of minor isotopes of carbon and oxygen in these gas giants, offering high-fidelity data points that may illuminate precise formation pathways.¹

Observational data also highlight a clear division among hot Jupiters based on their thermal structure: a dichotomy exists between planets with and without atmospheric temperature inversions, which correlates strongly with their equilibrium temperature.¹ These inversions are believed to be caused by high-altitude absorbers that effectively trap stellar light. Finally, the detection of vast tails of escaping helium gas in these highly irradiated systems provides observational evidence of ongoing atmospheric loss, placing direct constraints on models of planetary evolution.¹

V.B. Mini-Neptunes and Super-Earths: Compositional Diversity

Super-Earths (planets up to ) and Mini-Neptunes (often defined by radii between  and ) are planetary classes common in the galaxy but absent from our solar system.²¹ The fundamental question surrounding these worlds is their bulk composition: whether they are primarily rocky, contain large fractions of water ice, or possess substantial hydrogen/helium envelopes.²¹

GJ 1214b: This nearby sub-Neptune remained spectroscopically opaque for over a decade due to a thick, high-altitude haze.¹⁵ JWST successfully used mid-infrared emission spectroscopy to measure its thermal profile, achieving the first direct detection of light emitted by a planet in this mass class.¹⁵ The results suggest the atmosphere contains water vapor and is rich in elements heavier than hydrogen.¹⁵ This finding supports the notion that low-mass planet formation often involves the accretion of significant solid materials (rock or ice), resulting in a divergence from the solar system’s gas giant composition.

K2-18b and Hycean Worlds: The JWST investigation of K2-18b (), orbiting in its star’s habitable zone, revealed the presence of carbon-bearing molecules, specifically methane () and carbon dioxide ().⁶ These findings support the intriguing possibility that K2-18b is a Hycean exoplanet—a world characterized by a hydrogen-rich atmosphere enveloping a deep, potentially habitable water ocean.⁶ This discovery is crucial because it expands the traditional scope of habitability, requiring consideration of diverse environments beyond the classical Earth analog.⁶

V.C. Atmospheric Escape and Evolution

Atmospheric escape is a primary physical process that filters the outcomes of planetary evolution. While stellar radiation (particularly high-energy X-ray and UV flux) is the main driver, other stellar environmental factors, including stellar winds, stellar flares, coronal mass ejections, and magnetic fields, exert significant control over the escape mechanisms.²³ The observed detection of extended, escaping gaseous tails around highly irradiated planets provides direct constraints on how long low-mass planets can retain their volatile envelopes, fundamentally influencing the boundary of the long-term habitable zone.¹

VI. Conflicting Viewpoints and Ongoing Debates

VI.A. Planet Formation: Metallicity Correlation and the C/O Ratio

The exact nature of the relationship between host-star metallicity and giant planet occurrence is a subject of active research. While the link is generally accepted, questions persist regarding the precise functional form of this relationship and its applicability to terrestrial planets.¹³ Recent comprehensive analyses have identified systematic differences in formation outcomes tied to metallicity: sub-Jupiter mass planets () orbit hosts that are systematically less metallic than the hosts of Jupiter-mass planets.¹³ This observation suggests that planet formation channels are not monolithic, but may be complexly linked to disc lifetime and the availability of planet-building materials in high-metallicity environments.¹³ Importantly, these findings challenge the existence of a sharp mass breakpoint above which formation channels fundamentally differ; instead, the resulting mass may be strongly influenced by environmental conditions, such as stellar or disc mass.¹³

VI.B. The Limit of Precision: Stellar Contamination and Degeneracy

Stellar activity has long constituted a major systematic error source in transmission spectroscopy.⁷ A pressing debate has emerged concerning the robustness of emission spectroscopy against these same stellar uncertainties. Analysis reveals that even high-precision JWST secondary eclipse observations suffer from significant systematic error when stellar models are inaccurate. For instance, current stellar model discrepancies can introduce a  difference in eclipse depth for M8 stars.⁷ This error margin is sufficient to limit the ability to confidently constrain planetary albedo and prevent reliable distinction between different bare surface types (e.g., basalt versus granitoid).⁷ The proposed resolution is a systematic observational requirement: future JWST campaigns focusing on secondary eclipses must integrate concurrent stellar mid-infrared spectroscopy to anchor the stellar parameters and effectively remove this source of systematic uncertainty.⁷

VI.C. Biosignatures and the “Hypothesis of Last Resort”

The search for biosignatures, particularly molecular oxygen (), is complicated by the existence of numerous abiotic processes—or false positives—that can generate significant atmospheric  without the presence of life.²⁴ Mechanisms such as runaway water loss on M-dwarf planets can flood the atmosphere with  after hydrogen has escaped.²⁵

This reality has shifted the scientific focus from mere detection to robust validation. The consensus in astrobiology is that life must be treated as the “hypothesis of last resort”.²⁶ Robust interpretation of a potential biosignature requires comprehensive contextual observations, including constraining the planet’s UV environment, cloud coverage, total pressure, and the abundances of companion molecules (, , ).²⁴ The objective is to observationally rule out every potential abiotic mechanism, thereby increasing confidence in a biogenic interpretation. This mandates a holistic approach to characterization, where stellar properties (e.g., flare activity ²⁰) are essential components in assessing planetary habitability.

VII. Gaps in the Current Literature and Future Research Suggestions

VII.A. Gaps in the Current Literature

The most substantial scientific gaps involve the characterization of intrinsically difficult targets and limitations in connecting atmospheric observations to planet formation theory.

1. Temperate Rocky Exoplanets: While JWST has initiated characterization (e.g., TRAPPIST-1b ⁵), this population remains severely data-starved. The small atmospheric signal, coupled with the high systematic noise from active M-dwarf host stars, makes robust characterization extremely challenging.⁸ Furthermore, long-period exoplanets, which are often less irradiated and potentially dynamically analogous to outer solar system bodies, are heavily under-represented in the current spectroscopic catalog due to the selection bias inherent in transit surveys.
2. Formation Theory Disconnect: A fundamental theoretical gap persists in linking retrieved atmospheric composition (e.g., heterogeneous  abundances ²⁷) directly to the structural and chemical evolution of the protoplanetary disk. Models must better integrate the effects of disk inhomogeneities, the distribution of solid particles, and the simultaneous thermal and chemical processes that occur during planet formation.²⁷
3. Modeling Resolution Limitations: The persistent use of 1D atmospheric models for many retrieval analyses limits the understanding of key processes like atmospheric dynamics and heat transport. There is a need for the routine, systematic implementation of high-fidelity, 3D Global Circulation Models coupled with sophisticated photochemical schemes to accurately interpret the thermal structure and mixing processes in rapidly rotating or tidally locked worlds.¹⁹

VII.B. Strategic Future Research Roadmap

Addressing the literature gaps and ongoing debates requires a coordinated, multi-institutional, and computationally advanced roadmap.

1. Prioritize Integrated Campaigns for Terrestrial Worlds: The systemic challenges inherent in characterizing temperate rocky planets mandate that future research prioritize large-scale, joint space- and ground-based initiatives.⁸ To mitigate stellar activity and maximize data efficiency, observational planners must strategically prioritize multi-transit windows.⁸
2. Advance Computational and Measurement Infrastructure: The computational crisis must be addressed by the widespread adoption of amortized inference frameworks like FASTER ¹⁷ to manage the enormous data volumes from current and future missions. Furthermore, the systematic uncertainty introduced by stellar model inaccuracies dictates that all high-precision emission campaigns must mandate dedicated concurrent stellar mid-infrared spectroscopy.⁷
3. Exploit ELT for Dynamic Science: Future ground-based research must capitalize on the dramatic speed increase and resolution provided by ELTs (e.g., ELT/HARMONI).¹ This capability must be systematically employed to map atmospheric dynamics—global circulation, wind speeds, and atmospheric escape rates ²³—across diverse planetary classes, transitioning the field into a mature discipline of planetary atmospheric dynamics.
4. Define and Characterize Hycean Worlds: Continued, comprehensive follow-up characterization of Hycean candidates like K2-18b ⁶ is required. The focus must be on constraining the internal structures and testing the stability of these hydrogen-rich atmospheres, which offer a promising, non-Earth-like avenue in the search for extraterrestrial habitability.

VIII. Conclusions and Recommendations

Exoplanet atmospheric characterization has entered an era defined by high-fidelity space-based measurements and unprecedented computational demands. The field has moved successfully from the detection of elemental absorption in highly inflated Hot Jupiters to the chemical inventory of sub-Neptunes and the search for biosignatures on temperate worlds.

The core conclusions drawn from the current literature are threefold:

1. Synergy is Essential: No single observational technique can provide the full picture. The deepest scientific understanding requires the integration of JWST’s broad, high-precision molecular census, ARIEL’s statistical population overview, and the ELT’s high-resolution kinematic mapping capability.
2. The Star is a Systemic Error Source: For highly precise characterization, particularly of small planets around M-dwarfs, the host star cannot be treated as a stable blackbody. Stellar model uncertainties introduce significant systematic errors in both transmission and emission spectroscopy.⁷ Mitigating these errors requires dedicated, concurrent stellar observations and specialized retrieval methodologies.
3. Validation Over Detection: The scientific confidence necessary to identify biosignatures requires a shift in research strategy, focusing on ruling out all plausible abiotic false positive mechanisms through contextual observations (e.g., planetary context, stellar UV environment) before life can be considered the hypothesis of last resort.²⁶

Based on these conclusions, the following strategic recommendations are highly relevant: The astronomical community must prioritize the development and institutionalization of computationally efficient retrieval pipelines (e.g., amortized inference) to process the impending data volumes. Furthermore, future mission planning must be explicitly structured as coordinated, large-scale, joint space-ground campaigns, particularly for the ambitious goal of characterizing temperate, low-mass, potentially habitable worlds.

Works cited

1. Exoplanet Atmospheres at High Spectral Resolution | Annual Reviews, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-031342
2. [0805.0789] Ground-based detection of sodium in the transmission spectrum of exoplanet HD209458b – arXiv, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0789
3. Finding and Characterizing SuperEarth Exoplanets Using Transits and Eclipses, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://www8.nationalacademies.org/astro2010/DetailFileDisplay.aspx?id=236
4. Direct Imaging of Exoplanets – American Museum of Natural History, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://www.amnh.org/content/download/53052/796511/file/direct-imaging-of-exoplanets.pdf
5. Webb’s Impact on Exoplanet Research – NASA Science, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/mission/webb/science-overview/science-explainers/webbs-impact-on-exoplanet-research/
6. Webb Discovers Methane, Carbon Dioxide in Atmosphere of K2-18 b – NASA Science, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/missions/webb/webb-discovers-methane-carbon-dioxide-in-atmosphere-of-k2-18-b/
7. [2502.19585] Stellar Models Also Limit Exoplanet Atmosphere Studies in Emission – arXiv, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19585
8. De Wit et al. 2024: A roadmap for the atmospheric characterization of terrestrial exoplanets with JWST – NASA GISS, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://www.giss.nasa.gov/pubs/abs/de08900u.html
9. [2104.11251] Direct imaging and spectroscopy of exoplanets with the ELT/HARMONI high-contrast module – arXiv, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.11251
10. HARMONI – ELT | ESO, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://elt.eso.org/instrument/HARMONI/
11. Atmospheric Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey – NASA Science, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/mission/ariel/
12. Ariel Space Mission – European Space Agency M4 Mission, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://arielmission.space/
13. Heavy Metal Rules. I. Exoplanet Incidence and Metallicity – MDPI, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/9/3/105
14. Clouds and Hazes in Exoplanet Atmospheres – ResearchGate, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234813572_Clouds_and_Hazes_in_Exoplanet_Atmospheres
15. Researchers get first up-close look at mysterious planet’s atmosphere – UChicago News, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://news.uchicago.edu/story/researchers-get-first-close-look-mysterious-planets-atmosphere
16. New Type of Alien Planet Is a Steamy ‘Waterworld’ | Space, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://www.space.com/14634-alien-planet-steamy-waterworld-gj1214b.html
17. Near-instantaneous Atmospheric Retrievals and Model Comparison with FASTER – arXiv, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.18045v1
18. [2502.18045] Near-instantaneous Atmospheric Retrievals and Model Comparison with FASTER – arXiv, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18045
19. Disentangling atmospheric compositions of K2-18 b with next generation facilities – PMC, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9166872/
20. 3D modelling of the impact of stellar activity on tidally locked terrestrial exoplanets: atmospheric composition and habitability | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | Oxford Academic, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/518/2/2472/6779704
21. What Is a Super-Earth? – NASA Science, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanets/super-earth/
22. Super-Earth – Wikipedia, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-Earth
23. accessed on October 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18124#:~:text=Stellar%20radiation%20is%20one%20of,of%20exoplanet%2C%20as%20the%20planetary
24. Biosignature False Positives – NASA Technical Reports Server, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180004768/downloads/20180004768.pdf
25. Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6014580/
26. Life on the edge: using planetary context to enhance biosignatures and avoid false positives – Oxford Academic, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/mnras/staf1204/63851599/staf1204.pdf
27. Exoplanetary Atmospheres: Key Insights, Challenges and Prospects – NExScI, accessed on October 13, 2025, https://nexsci.caltech.edu/workshop/2019/madhusudhan_2019_exoplanets_review.pdf